课程文献中心 更多>>

关键词： 高等教育   国际化进程   高校外事管理工作  

摘要： 在经济全球化的背景下,各国的经济、贸易和文化交流日趋频繁和紧密,中国高等教育也在加快和扩大教育对外开放的进程中逐步与国际接轨,高等教育国际化对高校创新发展的驱动作用已日益显著.本文针对高等教育国际化背景下高校外事管理工作呈现出的新特点,探讨了新形势下高校外事管理工作的重点内容.

关键词： 国际交流与合作管理   集成化项目管理   外事管理  

摘要： 为解决国际化发展形势下,三门核电有限公司国际交流合作活动数量多、领域广、统筹协调难度大等问题,三门核电应用现代项目管理理论和方法,建立了集成化项目管理模式,近年来较好地应用于国际交流与合作的项目管理中.本文论述了国际交流合作项目集成化管理的实践,并进一步阐述了新时期国际交流与合作项目的管理改进建议.

摘要： (2021年5月26日在辽宁省第十三届人民代表大会常务委员会第二十六次会议上)辽宁省人民代表大会常务委员会：省人大民族侨务外事委员会于2021年5月18日召开第十五次全体会议，对本溪满族自治县人大常委会报请省人大常委会批准的《本溪满族自治县河道管理条例（修订）》（以下简称《条例》）进行了审查。

摘要： (2021年7月26日在辽宁省第十三届人民代表大会常务委员会第二十七次会议上)辽宁省人民代表大会常务委员会：省人大民族侨务外事委员会于2021年7月21日召开第十六次全体会议，对宽甸满族自治县人大常委会报请省人大常委会批准的《〈宽甸满族自治县风景区管理条例〉等3部单行条例修正案》（以下简称《修正案》）进行了审查。

关键词： 国际儿童读物联盟   中国儿童文学   国际安徒生奖   外事管理   公共外交   童书   国际交流活动   生命树  

摘要： 嘉宾介绍:张明舟,1991年毕业于上海外国语学院外事管理专业,曾任职于外交部亚洲司和中国少年儿童新闻出版总社有限公司,现任国际儿童读物联盟(IBBY)主席、中国儿童文学研究会常务副会长、中国出版协会理事,主要从事公共外交和儿童文学国际交流活动。他曾策划推动了国际儿童读物联盟与国际出版协会(IPA)的合作,设立了IBBY-iREAD爱阅人物奖,推动中国人获得“国际安徒生奖”等奖项。2020年初,在全球新冠肺炎疫情突袭而至之时,2月29日在全球倡议发起抗疫童书互译共读项目,创立生命树童书网,为孩子们带来了温暖和力量。2020年9月12日,张明舟再次当选为IBBY主席,成为该组织最高领导岗位上连任的首位中国人。

关键词： 文本处理   数据分析   数据管理   治理创新  

摘要： 政府外事管理办公室的信息系统记录了大量因公出国访问申请和归国总结报告数据。但是针对出国访问数据的治理和分析研究还非常少,而且这些数据的管理和挖掘还面临着数据异构、非结构化等挑战。文章面向因公出国业务数据,设计了一个大数据治理平台,能够对访问申请和总结报告实现统一的管理,并提出了包含多种组件的智能计算引擎,对数据进行多方位的分析,设计了面向不同用户的多种应用。该平台提升了出国访问数据的治理效果,实现访问成果的有效共享。

关键词： Contingency management   Opioids   Cocaine   HIV   Viral load suppression   Abstinence   Antiretroviral adherence  

摘要： Background: HIV-infected people who use drugs (PWUD) have poor HIV outcomes. Few studies tested interventions to improve HIV outcomes among PWUD. Abstinence-reinforcing contingency management (CM) reduces drug use and could also improve HIV outcomes. Methods: From 2012-2017, we conducted a randomized controlled trial testing whether a 16-week abstinence-reinforcing CM intervention improved HIV viral load (VL) among HIV-infected adults using opioids or cocaine. In the CM intervention, drug-free urines led to escalating value of vouchers ($2.50-$80/voucher, $1320 total maximum). In intention-to-treat mixed-effects linear and logistic regression analyses, we examined whether the CM intervention improved log(10) VL (primary outcome), abstinence and antiretroviral adherence (secondary outcomes). Results: Thirty-seven participants were randomized to the CM intervention and 36 to control. Median age was 49.2 years;most were male (61.6%) and non-Hispanic black (46.6%). In CM (vs. control) participants, mean reduction in log(10) VL was greater ( - 0.16 log(10) VL copies/mL per 4-week period;95% CI: -0.29 to -0.03, p < 0.05). Over 16 weeks, CM participants had a mean reduction of 0.64 copies/mL in log(10) VL greater than control participants. The CM intervention was not significantly associated with abstinence or adherence. Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate improvements in HIV VL via an abstinence-reinforcing CM intervention. Because the CM intervention did not significantly affect abstinence or adherence, the mechanism of its effect is unclear. To end the HIV epidemic, innovative strategies must address individuals with poor HIV outcomes. Abstinence-reinforcing CM may be one potential strategy to improve HIV outcomes among a select group of PWUD.

关键词： 冠心病   经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术   疾病管理能力   心理状况   心血管意外   关系  

摘要： [目的]探讨冠心病经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术(PTCA)病人术后疾病管理能力及心理状况与术后心血管意外事件发生的关系。[方法]选取2018年3月—2019年3月某院心内科收治的92例冠心病PTCA病人为研究对象,根据病人术后是否发生心血管意外事件将病人分为无心血管意外组68例和合并心血管意外组24例,应用冠心病自我管理行为量表(CSMS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)对两组病人进行评价,分别应用单因素及多元回归分析影响冠心病PTCA病人术后心血管意外发生的相关因素。[结果]无心血管意外组病人CSMS评分及各维度评分高于合并心血管意外组(P<0.05),而SAS评分、SDS评分低于合并心血管意外组(P<0.05)。经多元回归分析可知,病人植入支架数、SAS评分、SDS评分是引起冠心病PTCA病人术后心血管意外事件发生的危险因素(P<0.05),而CSMS评分是冠心病PTCA病人术后心血管意外事件发生的保护因素(P<0.05)。[结论]冠心病PTCA病人术后疾病管理能力及心理状况与术后心血管意外事件发生有密切的关系,提供病人疾病管理能力,减轻病人不良情绪将有助于预防心血管意外事件发生。

摘要： Family firms are increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous group of businesses with specific strengths and weaknesses that make them either superior or inferior to non-family firms. Recent research has therefore started shifting away from comparisons between family firms and non-family firms to comparisons between family firms. This study investigates the influence of two key paramete rs of 'familiness' - the generation in control and the (non-family) management diversity - on family firm innovation. While agency-based arguments stress the liabilities of these two parameters of family influence, resource-based arguments highlight their benefits. Conflicting effect hypotheses are derived and tested in the context of German family firms. The empirical results imply that family firms' generational development and higher management diversity influence their innovation positively and that their benefits outweigh their liabilities in the context of German family firms.

关键词： Contingency management   Drugs   HIV   Incentives   Providers   Qualitative   Substance use  

摘要： Background Over the last 50 years, there has been a growing interest in and use of contingency management (CM) for people who use substances. Yet, despite showing some level of efficacy (albeit only short-term) and being praised by researchers as beneficial and cost-saving, it continues to be underutilized by health care and service providers. Why that is remains unclear. Methods Recognizing a gap, we conducted a targeted analysis of a larger set of qualitative interviews conducted on the experience of health care and service providers with incentives (including prize-based CM) (n = 25). Results Four themes were identified during the analysis: 1) The specificities of prize-based CM, 2) The role of providers in administering prize-based CM, 3) The positive and negative impact on the relationship, and 4) The ethical concerns arising from prize-based CM. Overall, our findings are consistent with existing literature and suggest that providers are wary of using prize-based CM because they tend to value effort over success, support over reward, honesty over deceit, and certainty over probability and variability. Conclusion Our analysis offers additional insights into the experiences of providers who use prize-based CM and possibly some indications as to why they may not wish to work with this type of incentive. The question raised here is not whether there is enough evidence on the effectiveness of prize-based CM, but rather if this type of incentive is appropriate and ethical when caring for people who use substances.